[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fcb6dde-7ccc-4da6-5f8b-c8338edaa155@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:10:38 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, krzk@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] include: dt-bindings: add Performance Monitoring
Unit for Exynos
Hi Lukasz,
On 19. 4. 17. 오후 4:48, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> This patch add support of a new feature which can be used in DT:
> Performance Monitoring Unit with defined event data type.
> In this patch the event data types are defined for Exynos PPMU.
> The patch also updates the MAINTAINERS file accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
> include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3671fde..f4aac78 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -12376,6 +12376,11 @@ L: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> S: Supported
> F: drivers/scsi/pm8001/
>
> +PMU EXYNOS DT BINDINGS
> +M: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
> +S: Maintained
> +F: include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
> +
IMHO, I'm not sure that it is right of adding one dt-binding header file
to MAINTAINERS file. If right, I'm OK.
> PNP SUPPORT
> M: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> S: Maintained
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h b/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a6971eb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Samsung Exynos PPMU event types for counting in regs
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2019, Samsung
> + * Author: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_PMU_EXYNOS_PPMU_H
> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_PMU_EXYNOS_PPMU_H
> +
> +
> +#define PPMU_RO_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x0
> +#define PPMU_WO_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x1
> +#define PPMU_RW_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x2
> +#define PPMU_RO_REQUEST_CNT 0x3
> +#define PPMU_WO_REQUEST_CNT 0x4
> +#define PPMU_RO_DATA_CNT 0x5
> +#define PPMU_WO_DATA_CNT 0x6
> +#define PPMU_RO_LATENCY 0x12
> +#define PPMU_WO_LATENCY 0x16
> +#define PPMU_V2_EVT3_RW_DATA_CNT 0x22
If we can select the data type for monitoring, it looks good to me.
But, when I developed the Exynos PPMU, I has not tested other data type
except for PPMU_RO_DATA_CNT and PPMU_WO_DATA_CNT.
Do you test all data types with PPMU device?
> +
> +#endif
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists