[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190417120526.1fd9130c@xps13>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:05:26 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Cc: "bbrezillon@...nel.org" <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] mtd: nand: Make flags for bad block marker
position more granular
Hi Frieder,
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de> wrote on Mon, 18 Feb
2019 10:42:45 +0000:
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>
> To be able to check and set bad block markers in the first and
> second page of a block independently of each other, we create
> separate flags for both cases.
>
> Previously NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE meant, that both, the first and the
> second page were used. With this patch NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE stands for
> using the first page and NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE for using the second
> page.
>
> This patch is only for preparation of subsequent changes and does
> not implement the logic to actually handle both flags separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists