[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190417105947.GB5878@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:59:47 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
Cc: kvalo@...eaurora.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com, linuxwifi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: don't panic in error path on non-msix systems
On Wed 17-04-19 13:17:10, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi,
> > which tree is this supposed to be applied on? It doesn't do apply on
> > top
> > of v5.1-rc4-3-gfd008d1a7a20. iwl_trans_pcie_sync_nmi doesn't exist in
> > drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c. iwl_trans_sync_nmi
> > looks pretty similar. My patch massaging ended up with this. Please
> > double check. It compiles and even boots.
>
> Ah, sorry, I didn't mention that that patch was supposed to apply on
> top of wireless-drivers-next, which is on its way to v5.2. We have
> other patches touching this function there, thus the conflict.
This is hard to tell. I haven't seen any "Error sending SCAN_CFG_CMD:"
message in the kernel log yet and I believe this is related to the
crash. But I might be easily wrong here.
In any case, I suspect that those events usually happen in a different
wireless environment than I am running right now. So give me some more
time before I can be more confident with an answer.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists