[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-117ed45485413b1977bfc638c32bf5b01d53c62b@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:23:35 -0700
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...nel.org,
bp@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, nstange@...e.de
Subject: [tip:x86/irq] x86/irq/64: Remove stack overflow debug code
Commit-ID: 117ed45485413b1977bfc638c32bf5b01d53c62b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/117ed45485413b1977bfc638c32bf5b01d53c62b
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:00:08 +0200
Committer: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:41:48 +0200
x86/irq/64: Remove stack overflow debug code
All stack types on x86 64-bit have guard pages now.
So there is no point in executing probabilistic overflow checks as the
guard pages are a accurate and reliable overflow prevention.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190414160146.466354762@linutronix.de
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 56 ------------------------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 5ad92419be19..fd06614b09a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config X86_32
select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
select CLKSRC_I8253
select CLONE_BACKWARDS
+ select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
select OLD_SIGACTION
@@ -138,7 +139,6 @@ config X86
select HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
- select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
index f107eb2021f6..6bf6517a05bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -26,64 +26,8 @@
DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct irq_stack, irq_stack_backing_store) __visible;
DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
-int sysctl_panic_on_stackoverflow;
-
-/*
- * Probabilistic stack overflow check:
- *
- * Regular device interrupts can enter on the following stacks:
- *
- * - User stack
- *
- * - Kernel task stack
- *
- * - Interrupt stack if a device driver reenables interrupts
- * which should only happen in really old drivers.
- *
- * - Debug IST stack
- *
- * All other contexts are invalid.
- */
-static inline void stack_overflow_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
-#define STACK_MARGIN 128
- u64 irq_stack_top, irq_stack_bottom, estack_top, estack_bottom;
- u64 curbase = (u64)task_stack_page(current);
- struct cea_exception_stacks *estacks;
-
- if (user_mode(regs))
- return;
-
- if (regs->sp >= curbase + sizeof(struct pt_regs) + STACK_MARGIN &&
- regs->sp <= curbase + THREAD_SIZE)
- return;
-
- irq_stack_top = (u64)__this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_ptr);
- irq_stack_bottom = irq_stack_top - IRQ_STACK_SIZE + STACK_MARGIN;
- if (regs->sp >= irq_stack_bottom && regs->sp <= irq_stack_top)
- return;
-
- estacks = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
- estack_top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(estacks, DB);
- estack_bottom = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(estacks, DB) + STACK_MARGIN;
- if (regs->sp >= estack_bottom && regs->sp <= estack_top)
- return;
-
- WARN_ONCE(1, "do_IRQ(): %s has overflown the kernel stack (cur:%Lx,sp:%lx, irq stack:%Lx-%Lx, exception stack: %Lx-%Lx, ip:%pF)\n",
- current->comm, curbase, regs->sp,
- irq_stack_bottom, irq_stack_top,
- estack_bottom, estack_top, (void *)regs->ip);
-
- if (sysctl_panic_on_stackoverflow)
- panic("low stack detected by irq handler - check messages\n");
-#endif
-}
-
bool handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- stack_overflow_check(regs);
-
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists