linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: meson: g12a: add audio devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7hmukon0fo.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:58:19 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        patchwork-bot+notify@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: meson: g12a: add audio devices

Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 12:22 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>> > Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> writes:
>> > 
>> > > This patchset adds most the audio devices of the g12a SoCs.
>> > > 
>> > > Kevin, couple of things worth noting:
>> > >  * This patch depends of the new audio clocks binding recently applied
>> > >    by Neil [0].
>> > 
>> > Was this supposed to be part of the clk-headers dependency PR I
>> > received?  /me looks... It looks like it's applied right after the tag I
>> > pulled, so I doesn't look like it.
>> > 
>> > If I should queue $SUBJECT series up for 5.2, I'll need another stable
>> > tag.
>> 
>> Also, this doesn't apply cleanly anymore to my v5.2/dt64 branch.  When
>> the stable tag is ready, do you mind doing a rebase? (or telling me
>> what it currently applies to, and I will do the rebase.)
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Until we have a solution for the drive strength in pinctrl, I won't be able to
> submit the audio pins. I doubt it will happen in this cycle.
>
> Without the pins, audio won't work anyway ... so no rush
>
> If it is ok with you, I'll resend at the beginning of the next cycle. Clk and
> ASoC deps will be merged by then, so things should be more straight forward.

Works for me, thanks.

Kevin