linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: stm32-pwr: Make some symbols static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190417163836.GA1675@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:38:36 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: stm32-pwr: Make some symbols static

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:31:12AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:35:5: warning:
>  symbol 'ready_mask_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:47:5: warning:
>  symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:57:5: warning:
>  symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_enabled' was not declared. Should it be static?

Someone already sent a patch for this.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)