[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200c8e66-4245-967b-b80e-b6f6a63f80c5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:18:22 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com,
jank@...ence.com, joe@...ches.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] soundwire: fix style issues
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>>>> index 19c8efb9a5ee..84876a74874f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>>>
>>>> menuconfig SOUNDWIRE
>>>> bool "SoundWire support"
>>>> - ---help---
>>>> + help
>>>
>>> Not sure if this is a style issue, kernel seems to have 2990 instances
>>> of this!
>>
>> this is reported by checkpatch.pl --strict.
>
> Please don't run checkpatch on code that's already in the kernel, and
> especially not with the --strict (a.k.a. --subjective) option enabled.
>
> Don't try to fix what isn't broken.
I would agree in general, but this case is different: the SoundWire code
in the upstream kernel is missing parts left and right and isn't fully
functional as is. I will soon be posting what's missing, so this cleanup
is an opportunity to bring SoundWire to the latest coding standards
before adding the missing pieces which will be compliant with --strict.
For the record using --strict already exposed 3 major issues in the
yet-to-be-released code, so it's not as subjective as you describe it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists