| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190418160437.013658980@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:57:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Vallish Vaidyeshwara <vallish@...zon.com>,
Balbir Singh <sblbir@...n.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 77/92] bpf: move {prev_,}insn_idx into verifier env
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
commit c08435ec7f2bc8f4109401f696fd55159b4b40cb upstream.
Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into
the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various
helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put
this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only
to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later
on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vallish Vaidyeshwara <vallish@...zon.com>
[Backported to 4.14 by sblbir]
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <sblbir@...n.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops {
* one verifier_env per bpf_check() call
*/
struct bpf_verifier_env {
+ u32 insn_idx;
+ u32 prev_insn_idx;
struct bpf_prog *prog; /* eBPF program being verified */
struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
int stack_size; /* number of states to be processed */
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3892,7 +3892,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
struct bpf_reg_state *regs;
int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
- int insn_idx, prev_insn_idx = 0;
int insn_processed = 0;
bool do_print_state = false;
@@ -3902,19 +3901,18 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
env->cur_state = state;
init_reg_state(state->regs);
state->parent = NULL;
- insn_idx = 0;
for (;;) {
struct bpf_insn *insn;
u8 class;
int err;
- if (insn_idx >= insn_cnt) {
+ if (env->insn_idx >= insn_cnt) {
verbose("invalid insn idx %d insn_cnt %d\n",
- insn_idx, insn_cnt);
+ env->insn_idx, insn_cnt);
return -EFAULT;
}
- insn = &insns[insn_idx];
+ insn = &insns[env->insn_idx];
class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
if (++insn_processed > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS) {
@@ -3923,7 +3921,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
return -E2BIG;
}
- err = is_state_visited(env, insn_idx);
+ err = is_state_visited(env, env->insn_idx);
if (err < 0)
return err;
if (err == 1) {
@@ -3931,9 +3929,9 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
if (log_level) {
if (do_print_state)
verbose("\nfrom %d to %d: safe\n",
- prev_insn_idx, insn_idx);
+ env->prev_insn_idx, env->insn_idx);
else
- verbose("%d: safe\n", insn_idx);
+ verbose("%d: safe\n", env->insn_idx);
}
goto process_bpf_exit;
}
@@ -3943,25 +3941,25 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
if (log_level > 1 || (log_level && do_print_state)) {
if (log_level > 1)
- verbose("%d:", insn_idx);
+ verbose("%d:", env->insn_idx);
else
verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:",
- prev_insn_idx, insn_idx);
+ env->prev_insn_idx, env->insn_idx);
print_verifier_state(env->cur_state);
do_print_state = false;
}
if (log_level) {
- verbose("%d: ", insn_idx);
+ verbose("%d: ", env->insn_idx);
print_bpf_insn(env, insn);
}
- err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx);
+ err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, env->insn_idx, env->prev_insn_idx);
if (err)
return err;
regs = cur_regs(env);
- env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true;
+ env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].seen = true;
if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) {
err = check_alu_op(env, insn);
if (err)
@@ -3986,13 +3984,13 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
/* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable,
* the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func
*/
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off,
- BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ,
- insn->dst_reg, false);
+ err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->src_reg,
+ insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code),
+ BPF_READ, insn->dst_reg, false);
if (err)
return err;
- prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type;
+ prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].ptr_type;
if (*prev_src_type == NOT_INIT) {
/* saw a valid insn
@@ -4019,10 +4017,10 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) {
- err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn);
+ err = check_xadd(env, env->insn_idx, insn);
if (err)
return err;
- insn_idx++;
+ env->insn_idx++;
continue;
}
@@ -4038,13 +4036,13 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type;
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
- BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
- insn->src_reg, false);
+ err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->dst_reg,
+ insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code),
+ BPF_WRITE, insn->src_reg, false);
if (err)
return err;
- prev_dst_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type;
+ prev_dst_type = &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].ptr_type;
if (*prev_dst_type == NOT_INIT) {
*prev_dst_type = dst_reg_type;
@@ -4073,9 +4071,9 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
}
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
- BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
- -1, false);
+ err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->dst_reg,
+ insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code),
+ BPF_WRITE, -1, false);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -4091,7 +4089,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
return -EINVAL;
}
- err = check_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx);
+ err = check_call(env, insn->imm, env->insn_idx);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -4104,7 +4102,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
return -EINVAL;
}
- insn_idx += insn->off + 1;
+ env->insn_idx += insn->off + 1;
continue;
} else if (opcode == BPF_EXIT) {
@@ -4132,7 +4130,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
}
process_bpf_exit:
- err = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx, &insn_idx);
+ err = pop_stack(env, &env->prev_insn_idx, &env->insn_idx);
if (err < 0) {
if (err != -ENOENT)
return err;
@@ -4142,7 +4140,7 @@ process_bpf_exit:
continue;
}
} else {
- err = check_cond_jmp_op(env, insn, &insn_idx);
+ err = check_cond_jmp_op(env, insn, &env->insn_idx);
if (err)
return err;
}
@@ -4159,8 +4157,8 @@ process_bpf_exit:
if (err)
return err;
- insn_idx++;
- env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true;
+ env->insn_idx++;
+ env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].seen = true;
} else {
verbose("invalid BPF_LD mode\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -4170,7 +4168,7 @@ process_bpf_exit:
return -EINVAL;
}
- insn_idx++;
+ env->insn_idx++;
}
verbose("processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists