[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190418194857.GB14885@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:48:58 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
"Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:34:15AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Add pm runtime support and move clock handling there.
> fsl_esai_suspend is replaced by pm_runtime_force_suspend.
> fsl_esai_resume is replaced by pm_runtime_force_resume.
The change looks fine, yet I'd prefer to have a good justification
in the commit message. It could be simply some benefit of doing so
like what you have discussed with Mark.
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Please add it in next version upon commit message update:
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists