linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190418210702.GN3288@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:07:02 -0400
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:08:39PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:06:14AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This series implements initial write protection support for
> > userfaultfd.  Currently both shmem and hugetlbfs are not supported
> > yet, but only anonymous memory.  This is the 3nd version of it.
> > 
> > The latest code can also be found at:
> > 
> >   https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/tree/uffd-wp-merged
> > 
> > Note again that the first 5 patches in the series can be seen as
> > isolated work on page fault mechanism.  I would hope that they can be
> > considered to be reviewed/picked even earlier than the rest of the
> > series since it's even useful for existing userfaultfd MISSING case
> > [8].
> 
> Ping - any further comments for v3?  Is there any chance to have this
> series (or the first 5 patches) for 5.2?

Few issues left, sorry for taking so long to get to review, sometimes
it goes to the bottom of my stack.

I am guessing this should be merge through Andrew ? Unless Andrea have
a tree for userfaultfd (i am not following all that closely).

>From my point of view it almost all look good. I sent review before
this email. Maybe we need some review from x86 folks on the x86 arch
changes for the feature ?

Cheers,
Jérôme