linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 01/31] mm: introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190418214721.GA11645@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:47:21 -0400
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, dave@...olabs.net,
        jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        kemi.wang@...el.com, Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>,
        vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@...il.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
        Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@...el.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, sj38.park@...il.com,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/31] mm: introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:44:52PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> This configuration variable will be used to build the code needed to
> handle speculative page fault.
> 
> By default it is turned off, and activated depending on architecture
> support, ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL, SMP and MMU.
> 
> The architecture support is needed since the speculative page fault handler
> is called from the architecture's page faulting code, and some code has to
> be added there to handle the speculative handler.
> 
> The dependency on ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL is required because vm_normal_page()
> does processing that is not compatible with the speculative handling in the
> case ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL is not set.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>

Small question below

> ---
>  mm/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 0eada3f818fa..ff278ac9978a 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -761,4 +761,26 @@ config GUP_BENCHMARK
>  config ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
>  	bool
>  
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +       def_bool n
> +
> +config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	bool "Speculative page faults"
> +	default y
> +	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	depends on ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL && MMU && SMP
> +	help
> +	  Try to handle user space page faults without holding the mmap_sem.
> +
> +	  This should allow better concurrency for massively threaded processes

Is there any case where it does not provide better concurrency ? The
should make me wonder :)

> +	  since the page fault handler will not wait for other thread's memory
> +	  layout change to be done, assuming that this change is done in
> +	  another part of the process's memory space. This type of page fault
> +	  is named speculative page fault.
> +
> +	  If the speculative page fault fails because a concurrent modification
> +	  is detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet
> +	  allocated, the speculative page fault fails and a classic page fault
> +	  is then tried.
> +
>  endmenu
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>