[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <804954a6-9f5b-28ca-ead1-891be93735ee@mentor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:36:54 +0900
From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
<edubezval@...il.com>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
"Frkuska, Joshua" <Joshua_Frkuska@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: request IRQ after
device initialization
Hi Daniel
Thanks for your comments
On 2019/04/17 17:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 05:01, Jiada Wang wrote:
>> Hi Daniel
>>
>> On 2019/04/17 4:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2019 12:03, Jiada Wang wrote:
>>>> Currently IRQ is remain enabled after .remove, later if device is
>>>> probed,
>>>> IRQ is requested before .thermal_init, this may cause IRQ function be
>>>> triggered but not able to clear IRQ status, thus cause system to hang.
>>>>
>>>> this patch by moving request of IRQ after device initialization to
>>>> avoid this issue.
>>>
>>> Why not disable the interrupt and clear the irq status in the .remove
>>> callback, so the place is clean when probing again?
>>>
>>>
>>> struct rcar_gen3_thermal_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>
>>> rcar_thermal_irq_set(priv, false);
>>>
>>> should do the trick no ?
>>>
>> yes, this issue also can be addressed by disable the interrupt in .remove.
>>
>> But there is race condition between .remove and irq thread function,
>> (which enables IRQ)
>> so driver need to ensure threaded irq has been disabled before call
>> rcar_thermal_irq_set(priv, false) in .remove.
>> this adds additional complexity.
>>
>> I am fine with both solutions,
>> what is your opinion?
>
> My opinion is it is the tree hiding the forest.
>
> After a quick look at the irq setup and handling, it appears the
> implementation is cumbersome. This part should be fixed before the rest:
>
> - check IRQF_ONESHOT flag
> - remove the lock in the interrupt handlers
> - remove rcar_gen3_thermal_irq() which is pointless
> - check the IRQF_SHARED flag is correct (I doubt)
>
yes, I think rather than IRQF_SHARED, IRQF_ONESHOT flag need to be used.
these suggestions make sense, I will add these changes in v2 patch-set
> As the function devm_request_threaded_irq() is called 3 times, you
> should add the priv->tscs[i]->zone in the private data and the irq
> thread handler should look like:
>
> static irqreturn_t rcar_gen3_thermal_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = data;
>
> thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
>
> [ ... ]
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
hmmm, IRQ is requested 2 times to monitor low and high temperature of
all tzs.
Thanks,
Jiada
> When the implementation is fixed, then we can take care of the .remove
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
>>>> b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
>>>> index 88fa41cf16e8..4d095d7f9763 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_gen3_thermal.c
>>>> @@ -375,28 +375,6 @@ static int rcar_gen3_thermal_probe(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Request 2 (of the 3 possible) IRQs, the driver only needs to
>>>> - * to trigger on the low and high trip points of the current
>>>> - * temp window at this point.
>>>> - */
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>>> - irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>>>> - if (irq < 0)
>>>> - return irq;
>>>> -
>>>> - irqname = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:ch%d",
>>>> - dev_name(dev), i);
>>>> - if (!irqname)
>>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>>> -
>>>> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq,
>>>> rcar_gen3_thermal_irq,
>>>> - rcar_gen3_thermal_irq_thread,
>>>> - IRQF_SHARED, irqname, priv);
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>>> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>>>> @@ -458,6 +436,32 @@ static int rcar_gen3_thermal_probe(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> goto error_unregister;
>>>> }
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Request 2 (of the 3 possible) IRQs, the driver only needs to
>>>> + * to trigger on the low and high trip points of the current
>>>> + * temp window at this point.
>>>> + */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>>>> + if (irq < 0) {
>>>> + ret = irq;
>>>> + goto error_unregister;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + irqname = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:ch%d",
>>>> + dev_name(dev), i);
>>>> + if (!irqname) {
>>>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + goto error_unregister;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq,
>>>> rcar_gen3_thermal_irq,
>>>> + rcar_gen3_thermal_irq_thread,
>>>> + IRQF_SHARED, irqname, priv);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + goto error_unregister;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> rcar_thermal_irq_set(priv, true);
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists