linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/16] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3902d8a-e853-c669-6ce5-c256e4c0c27f@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:37:47 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/16] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer

On 04/18/2019 05:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:51:24PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 04/17/2019 10:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 01:22:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> @@ -650,6 +686,33 @@ __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
>>>>  	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
>>>>  	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>>>>  
>>>> +	if (!rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem))
>>>> +		goto queue;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Undo read bias from down_read() and do optimistic spinning.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
>>>> +	adjustment = 0;
>>>> +	if (rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem, false)) {
>>>> +		unsigned long flags;
>>>> +
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * Opportunistically wake up other readers in the wait queue.
>>>> +		 * It has another chance of wakeup at unlock time.
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS) &&
>>>> +		    raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) {
>>> why trylock?
>> I used trylock to avoid getting stuck in the spinlock while holding a
>> read lock on the rwsem.
> Is that a real concern? I would think that not waking further readers
> would, esp. under high contention, be a bigger deal.

Yes, I can certainly change it to a regular spin_lock().

Cheers,
Longman