[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190418144655.18758-3-lkundrak@v3.sk>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:46:47 +0200
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v7 02/10] x86/platform/olpc: Don't split string literals when fixing up the DT
It was pointed out in a review, and checkpatch.pl complains about this.
Breaking it down into multiple ofw evaluations works just as well and
reads better.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
Changes since v6:
- s/perhaps even reads better/reads better/ in the commit message
- Collect ack from Thomas Gleixner
- Fix the subject prefix to "x86/platform/olpc:"
Changes since v5:
- This patch was split off from "x86, olpc: Use a correct version when
making up a battery node"
arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
index ac9e7bf49b66..87e1d81684c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
@@ -242,9 +242,9 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
pr_info("PROM DT: Old firmware detected, applying fixes\n");
/* Add olpc,xo1-battery compatible marker to battery node */
- olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device"
- " \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible"
- " device-end");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
board_rev = olpc_dt_get_board_revision();
if (!board_rev)
@@ -252,19 +252,24 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
if (board_rev >= olpc_board_pre(0xd0)) {
/* XO-1.5: add dcon device */
- olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device"
- " new-device"
- " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
- " finish-device device-end");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" new-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" dcon\" device-name");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" finish-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
} else {
/* XO-1: add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc */
- olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device"
- " new-device"
- " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
- " finish-device device-end"
- " \" /rtc\" find-device"
- " \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible"
- " device-end");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" new-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" dcon\" device-name");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" finish-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
+
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /rtc\" find-device");
+ olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible");
+ olpc_dt_interpret("device-end");
}
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists