linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] vfs, coda: Fix the lack of locking in FID replacement inode rehashing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:48:50 -0400
From:   Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
CC:     coda@...cmu.edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] vfs, coda: Fix the lack of locking in FID replacement inode rehashing

That looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>


On April 18, 2019 10:06:07 AM EDT, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>- but, as the comment notes, this really needs some locking.
>
>Fix this by moving the core part of the code to fs/inode.c and