linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/26] compat_ioctl: move simple ppp command handling into driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a06NdTDVpDn-KWmdc4_562Ge=hYe2Zw39mx5s0FP+KD6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:14:21 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net>,
        Dmitry Kozlov <xeb@...l.ru>,
        James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
        linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/26] compat_ioctl: move simple ppp command handling
 into driver

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:53 AM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:03:07AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:13 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:19:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
> > > > index c708400fff4a..04252c3492ee 100644
_ptr(arg) to ppp_ioctl() and be done with that
> > > }
> > >
> > > with BPF-related bits (both compat and native) taken to e.g. net/core/bpf-ppp.c,
> > > picked by both generic and isdn?  IDGI...
> >
> > I was trying to unify the native and compat code paths as much
> > as possible here. Handling the four PPPIO*32 commands in
> > compat_ppp_ioctl would either require duplicating large chunks
> > of ppp_ioctl, or keeping the extra compat_alloc_user_space()
> > copy from the existing implementation.
> >
> > I'll try to come up with a different way to structure the patches.
>
> Huh?  Instead of
>         case PPPIOCSCOMPRESS:
>                 err = ppp_set_compress(ppp, arg);
>                 break;
> in native, have
>         struct ppp_option_data data;
> ...
>         case PPPIOCSCOMPRESS:
>                 if (copy_from_user(&data, argp, sizeof(data)))
>                         err = -EFAULT;
>                 else
>                         err = ppp_set_compress(ppp, &data);
>                 break;

Right, I ended up with something similar before I saw your message.

> in native and similar in compat, with get_bpf_ppp() replaced
> with call of compat_get_bpf_ppp() and ioctl numbers obviously
> adjusted.  All there is to it...  Helpers obviously shared
> with isdn and yes, all crap gone from fs/compat_ioctl.c...

I would still leave the ISDN side alone, aside from adding
the 64-bit time_t support.

> Why would you want to duplicate large chunks of anything?
> The above is not even compile-tested, but...  I can put
> together a patch if you wish.  Or am I missing something
> here?

I expected that the ppp_compat_ioctl() function would end up
fairly complex, to duplicate the logic before the switch()/case.

What I have now is

static long ppp_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
        struct ppp_file *pf;
        struct ppp *ppp;
        int err = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
        struct ppp_option_data32 data32;
        struct ppp_option_data data;
        void __user *argp = compat_ptr(arg);

        mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);

        pf = file->private_data;
        if (!pf || pf->kind != INTERFACE)
                goto out;

        ppp = PF_TO_PPP(pf);
        switch (cmd) {
        case PPPIOCSCOMPRESS32:
                if (copy_from_user(&data32, argp, sizeof(data32))) {
                        err = -EFAULT;
                        goto out;
                }

                data.ptr = compat_ptr(data32.ptr);
                data.length = data32.length;
                data.transmit = data32.transmit;

                err = ppp_set_compress(ppp, &data);
                break;

#ifdef CONFIG_PPP_FILTER
        case PPPIOCSPASS32:
                err = compat_get_sock_fprog(&uprog, argp);
                if (err)
                        break;
                err = ppp_set_filter(ppp, &uprog, &ppp->pass_filter);
                break;

        case PPPIOCSACTIVE32:
                err = compat_get_sock_fprog(&uprog, argp);
                if (err)
                        break;
                err = ppp_set_filter(ppp, &uprog, &ppp->active_filter);
                break;
#endif /* CONFIG_PPP_FILTER */

        default:
                break;
        }

out:
        mutex_unlock(&ppp_mutex);

        if (err == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
                err = ppp_ioctl(file, cmd, (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg));

        return err;
}

Which doesn't look nearly as bad as I had feared, but still is
a larger change to the existing code than what I had before,
so there is a bigger risk that I screwed up somewhere new.

       Arnd