[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6461bd3-dae0-9520-f5f7-01e48338df01@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:50:23 -0700
From: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
To: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, dick.kennedy@...adcom.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: lpfc: Make lpfc_sli4_oas_verify static
On 4/17/2019 8:05 AM, Yue Haibing wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:13091:1: warning:
> symbol 'lpfc_sli4_oas_verify' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index 8e0de48..eaaef68 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -13087,7 +13087,7 @@ lpfc_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> * is destroyed.
> *
> **/
> -void
> +static void
> lpfc_sli4_oas_verify(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> {
>
Looks good. Interesting as there's a prototype for the function earlier
which defines it as static.
Reviewed-by: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
-- james
Powered by blists - more mailing lists