[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190418165345.20909-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:53:45 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/fb/ramgk104: fix spelling mistake "sucessfully" -> "successfully"
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
There is a spelling mistake in a nvkm_debug message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
index 8bcb7e79a0cb..456aed1f2a02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ gk104_ram_calc_xits(struct gk104_ram *ram, struct nvkm_ram_data *next)
nvkm_error(subdev, "unable to calc plls\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "sucessfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "successfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
" (refclock: %i kHz)\n", next->freq, ret);
} else {
/* calculate refpll coefficients */
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists