linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: Add debugfs switch to disable at run time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190419002911.GB559@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 02:29:11 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: Add debugfs switch to disable at run time

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:07:45PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 01:29:10AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Which reminds me, Tony, I think all those debugging files "pfn"
> > and "array" and the one you add now, should all be under a
> > CONFIG_RAS_CEC_DEBUG which is default off and used only for development.
> > Mind adding that too pls?
> 
> Patch below, on top of previous patch.  Note that I didn't move "enable"
> into the RAS_CEC_DEBUG code. I think it has some value even on
> production systems.

And that value is? Usecase?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.