[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190419182241.GB1136@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:22:42 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
"Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table
with function
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:23:53AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> @@ -289,6 +318,12 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + ret = fsl_asrc_sel_proc(inrate, outrate, &pre_proc, &post_proc);
Since the function always return 0, I am thinking of treating
this function as a lookup function, and then moving this call
right before the register settings -- as we have already made
sure that both inrate and outrate are supported.
> + if (ret) {
> + pair_err("No supported pre-processing options\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
And probably no longer need this error-out. If there's a new
limitation related to this function, I believe we can add it
to the rate validation section as we are doing now -- better
to have rate validation code at one place.
> @@ -380,8 +415,8 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
> /* Apply configurations for pre- and post-processing */
Here:
- /* Apply configurations for pre- and post-processing */
+ /* Select and apply configurations for pre- and post-processing */
+ fsl_asrc_sel_proc(inrate, outrate, &pre_proc, &post_proc);
> regmap_update_bits(asrc_priv->regmap, REG_ASRCFG,
> ASRCFG_PREMODi_MASK(index) | ASRCFG_POSTMODi_MASK(index),
> - ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, process_option[in][out][0]) |
> - ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, process_option[in][out][1]));
> + ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, pre_proc) |
> + ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, post_proc));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists