linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: Make symbols static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190419161206.GA18211@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:12:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: Make symbols static

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:41:09PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:35:5: warning:
>  symbol 'ready_mask_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:47:5: warning:
>  symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:57:5: warning:
>  symbol 'stm32_pwr_reg_is_enabled' was not declared. Should it be static?

This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend (I
think it's just that someone else made similar fixes already but didn't
check properly).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)