linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:53:50 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] userfaultfd: write protection support

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:07:02PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:08:39PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:06:14AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > This series implements initial write protection support for
> > > userfaultfd.  Currently both shmem and hugetlbfs are not supported
> > > yet, but only anonymous memory.  This is the 3nd version of it.
> > > 
> > > The latest code can also be found at:
> > > 
> > >   https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/tree/uffd-wp-merged
> > > 
> > > Note again that the first 5 patches in the series can be seen as
> > > isolated work on page fault mechanism.  I would hope that they can be
> > > considered to be reviewed/picked even earlier than the rest of the
> > > series since it's even useful for existing userfaultfd MISSING case
> > > [8].
> > 
> > Ping - any further comments for v3?  Is there any chance to have this
> > series (or the first 5 patches) for 5.2?
> 
> Few issues left, sorry for taking so long to get to review, sometimes
> it goes to the bottom of my stack.
> 
> I am guessing this should be merge through Andrew ? Unless Andrea have
> a tree for userfaultfd (i am not following all that closely).
> 
> From my point of view it almost all look good. I sent review before
> this email. Maybe we need some review from x86 folks on the x86 arch
> changes for the feature ?

Thank you for your time on reviewing the series (my thanks to Mike
too!).  I have no idea on anyone else I should ask for help for
further review comments, but anyway I'd be more than glad to discuss
with any further concerns or do anything to move this series forward.
Because AFAIK mutliple userspace projects are waiting for this series
to settle.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu