| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OFh0UDvMkt+yTKBLjysuTmB==Lug-=d04E_eUHPn1ENQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:05:09 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] dma-buf: add explicit buffer pinning
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:39 PM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add optional explicit pinning callbacks instead of implicitly assume the
> exporter pins the buffer when a mapping is created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index a3738fab3927..f23ff8355505 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -630,6 +630,41 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
>
> +/**
> + * dma_buf_pin - Lock down the DMA-buf
> + *
> + * @dmabuf: [in] DMA-buf to lock down.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + reservation_object_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
> +
> + if (dmabuf->ops->pin)
> + ret = dmabuf->ops->pin(dmabuf);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_pin);
> +
> +/**
> + * dma_buf_unpin - Remove lock from DMA-buf
> + *
> + * @dmabuf: [in] DMA-buf to unlock.
> + */
> +void dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> +{
> + reservation_object_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
> +
> + if (dmabuf->ops->unpin)
> + dmabuf->ops->unpin(dmabuf);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_unpin);
> +
> /**
> * dma_buf_map_attachment_locked - Maps the buffer into _device_ address space
> * with the reservation lock held. Is a wrapper for map_dma_buf() of the
> @@ -666,6 +701,8 @@ dma_buf_map_attachment_locked(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> */
> if (attach->invalidate)
> list_del(&attach->node);
> + else
> + dma_buf_pin(attach->dmabuf);
> sg_table = attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
> if (attach->invalidate)
> list_add(&attach->node, &attach->dmabuf->attachments);
> @@ -735,6 +772,8 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment_locked(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>
> attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table,
> direction);
> + if (!attach->invalidate)
> + dma_buf_unpin(attach->dmabuf);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment_locked);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index ece4638359a8..a615b74e5894 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -100,14 +100,40 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> */
> void (*detach)(struct dma_buf *, struct dma_buf_attachment *);
>
> + /**
> + * @pin_dma_buf:
> + *
> + * This is called by dma_buf_pin and lets the exporter know that an
> + * importer assumes that the DMA-buf can't be invalidated any more.
> + *
> + * This is called with the dmabuf->resv object locked.
> + *
> + * This callback is optional.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + *
> + * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> + */
> + int (*pin)(struct dma_buf *);
> +
> + /**
> + * @unpin_dma_buf:
> + *
> + * This is called by dma_buf_unpin and lets the exporter know that an
> + * importer doesn't need to the DMA-buf to stay were it is any more.
This should read:
* importer doesn't need the DMA-buf to stay were it is anymore.
> + *
> + * This is called with the dmabuf->resv object locked.
> + *
> + * This callback is optional.
> + */
> + void (*unpin)(struct dma_buf *);
> +
> /**
> * @map_dma_buf:
> *
> * This is called by dma_buf_map_attachment() and is used to map a
> * shared &dma_buf into device address space, and it is mandatory. It
> - * can only be called if @attach has been called successfully. This
> - * essentially pins the DMA buffer into place, and it cannot be moved
> - * any more
> + * can only be called if @attach has been called successfully.
> *
> * This call may sleep, e.g. when the backing storage first needs to be
> * allocated, or moved to a location suitable for all currently attached
> @@ -148,9 +174,6 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> *
> * This is called by dma_buf_unmap_attachment() and should unmap and
> * release the &sg_table allocated in @map_dma_buf, and it is mandatory.
> - * It should also unpin the backing storage if this is the last mapping
> - * of the DMA buffer, it the exporter supports backing storage
> - * migration.
> *
> * This is always called with the dmabuf->resv object locked when
> * no_sgt_cache is true.
> @@ -442,6 +465,8 @@ int dma_buf_fd(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, int flags);
> struct dma_buf *dma_buf_get(int fd);
> void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
>
> +int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
> +void dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
> struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment_locked(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> enum dma_data_direction);
> struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists