[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a53346cd-9eec-7ca6-3a09-a5558a5c9aa8@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:10:43 -0600
From: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ipc: Fix msgque compiler warnings
On 4/8/19 2:01 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Apr 2019, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> This fixes the various compiler warnings when building the msgque
>> selftest. The primary change is using sys/msg.h instead of linux/msg.h
>> directly to gain the API declarations.
>>
>> Fixes: 3a665531a3b7 ("selftests: IPC message queue copy feature test")
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> (Not really related to this patch)
>
> Given that the selftest/ipc/ only consists of this test, I wonder if
> the test should just be moved to ltp, where the ipc tests are a lot
> more complete and robust -- and which I've been using for years for
> basic testing code changes.
>
Having this test in here helps us find regressions quickly. It does good
and no harm keeping this test in here.
I don't think it is a good idea to remove it all together.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists