linux-kernel - Re: DISCONTIGMEM is deprecated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190419142835.GM18914@techsingularity.net>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:28:35 +0100
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DISCONTIGMEM is deprecated

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 07:05:21AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > DISCONTIG is essentially deprecated and even parisc plans to move to
> > SPARSEMEM so there is no need to be fancy, this patch simply disables
> > watermark boosting by default on DISCONTIGMEM.
> 
> I don't think parisc is the only arch which uses DISCONTIGMEM for !NUMA
> scenarios.  Grepping the arch/ directories shows:
> 
> alpha (does support NUMA, but also non-NUMA DISCONTIGMEM)
> arc (for supporting more than 1GB of memory)
> ia64 (looks complicated ...)
> m68k (for multiple chunks of memory)
> mips (does support NUMA but also non-NUMA)
> parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
> 
> I'm not sure that these architecture maintainers even know that DISCONTIGMEM
> is deprecated.  Adding linux-arch to the cc.

Poor wording then -- yes, DISCONTIGMEM is still used but look where it's
used. I find it impossible to believe that any new arch would support
DISCONTIGMEM or that DISCONTIGMEM would be selected when SPARSEMEM is
available.`It's even more insane when you consider that SPARSEMEM can be
extended to support VMEMMAP so that it has similar overhead to FLATMEM
when mapping pfns to struct pages and vice-versa.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs