[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190419104123.GB111210@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:41:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.1 0/3] Restartable Sequences updates for 5.1
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> Those changes aiming at 5.1 include one comment cleanup, the removal of
> the rseq_len field from the task struct which serves no purpose
> considering that the struct size is fixed by the ABI, and a selftest
> improvement adapting the number of threads to the number of detected
> CPUs, which is nicer for smaller systems.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> Mathieu Desnoyers (3):
> rseq: cleanup: Reflect removal of event counter in comments
> rseq: cleanup: remove rseq_len from task_struct
> rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus
>
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 3 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 5 +----
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ----
> kernel/rseq.c | 9 +++------
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 7 +++++--
> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Looks good, I've applied these to tip:core/rseq to make sure they don't
miss the v5.2 merge window.
(Let me know if you wanted to handle this differently.)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists