linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: core-api: fix broken references for div64.c and gcd.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190419133556.80a049d3fbc71f0f2d594702@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:35:56 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: core-api: fix broken references for div64.c and
 gcd.c

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:55:48 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:

> > -.. kernel-doc:: lib/div64.c
> > +.. kernel-doc:: lib/math/div64.c
> >     :functions: div_s64_rem div64_u64_rem div64_u64 div64_s64
> >  
> > -.. kernel-doc:: lib/gcd.c
> > +.. kernel-doc:: lib/math/gcd.c
> >     :export:
> 
> This, of course, creates a build error in docs-next...hopefully that
> situation won't last more than a couple of weeks or so.

I'll fold this into the base patch
lib-move-mathematic-helpers-to-separate-folder.patch so there won't be
such a situation.

> Applied, thanks.

Please unapply ;)