linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/50] 4.9.170-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190420011245.GG17719@sasha-vm>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 21:12:45 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/50] 4.9.170-stable review

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 01:16:37PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:39:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:57:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.170 release.
>> > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Sat Apr 20 16:03:22 UTC 2019.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
>> Failed builds:
>> 	i386:tools/perf
>> 	x86_64:tools/perf
>
>Caused by "tools include: Adopt linux/bits.h". That isn't really
>a bug fix, and since it is the last commit in the perf directory
>it isn't needed either. Reverting it fixes the problem.

Indeed. I'll remove it from all branches since it doesn't look like a
fix to begin with.

--
Thanks,
Sasha