[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFv8NwKZskTeyaUQWevydfxZf0=nf+Z4kBOkYynTfiOMOq-LDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:39:13 +0800
From: Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
To: "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
Cc: "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"djkurtz@...omium.org" <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com"
<Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>, yuhsuan@...omium.org,
tzungbi@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: DA7219: Fix failure in hw_params by
not letting set_rate error out
Hi Akshu,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 2:15 PM Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@....com> wrote:
>
> We need to set minimum bclk 64x of wclk as this is hw constraint in one
> of the component used.
> Since, clk_set_rate and clk is enabled in machine driver the
> clk_set_rate in hw_params of da7219 fails and errors out and when it
> tries to override the value.
>
> In cases like these not only clk_set_rate of da7219 codec should fail
> and not override the value but also should not error out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> index 5f5fa3416af3..a041dbf442af 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> @@ -1621,13 +1621,7 @@ static int da7219_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>
> if (bclk) {
> bclk_rate = frame_size * sr;
> - ret = clk_set_rate(bclk, bclk_rate);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(component->dev,
> - "Failed to set BCLK rate %lu: %d\n",
> - bclk_rate, ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + clk_set_rate(bclk, bclk_rate);
I think this might mask the real issue when setting rate fails.
A more fundamental problem might be what are the acceptable ratios
between bclk and wclk.
>From existing code of da7219 I see there are only two choices of
frame_size: 32 or 64.
In da7219_hw_params:
...
if (da7219->master && !da7219->tdm_en) {
if ((word_len * DA7219_DAI_CH_NUM_MAX) <= 32)
frame_size = 32;
else
frame_size = 64;
And in https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/17/322
the choice from machine driver is 64 or higher.
In cz_da7219_params:
...
if (bclk < (wclk * 64))
bclk = wclk * 64;
return da7219_clk_enable(substream, wclk, bclk);
I don't know what is the best solution to avoid this conflict.
Maybe just set a fixed ratio from device property that can best work
for the combination of codecs on the machine?
> } else {
> ret = da7219_set_bclks_per_wclk(component, frame_size);
> if (ret) {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists