lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190422104523.4bfca4ad@archlinux>
Date:   Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:45:23 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-core.c: This patch fix
 the following checkpatch warning.

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:50:18 +0200
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 5:53 PM Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > As per Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt Msleep < 20ms can sleep for
> > up to 20ms. so use usleep_range.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>  
> 
> All right, should work as fine.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Thanks and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.

Whilst we are here, there is a 'false' warning that we should clear up at
somepoint (from sparse)

CHECK   drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-core.c
drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-core.c:544:48: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-core.c:544:48:    expected restricted __be16 <noident>
drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-core.c:544:48:    got int

Line in question is setting the __be16 value to 0xAAAA where endian choice has
no effect.  I'll send out the trivial 'fix' in a minute.  Give the compiler
can sort it out at build time it should make no actual difference.

Usual arguments apply for why we bother to suppress 'false' build warnings
like this...

Anyhow patch shortly.

Jonathan



> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ