lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:55:20 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: ensure d_flags & d_inode are consistent in
 lookup_fast()

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 04:48:10PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:

> The root cause is the inconsistency between d_flags & d_inode
> during the REF-walk in lookup_fast(): d_is_negative(dentry)
> returns false, but d_backing_inode() still returns a NULL pointer.
> 
> The RCU-walk path in lookup_fast() uses d_seq to ensure d_flags & d_inode
> are consistent, and lookup_slow() use inode lock to ensure that, so only
> the REF-walk path in lookup_fast() is problematic.
> 
> Fixing it by adding a paired smp_rmb/smp_wmb between the reading/writing
> of d_inode & d_flags to ensure the consistency.

The problem is real, but I'm not sure I like the proposed fix ;-/
We could simply use d_really_is_negative() there, avoiding all that
mess.  If and when we get around to whiteouts-in-dcache (i.e. if
unionfs series gets resurrected), we can revisit that...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists