[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190422071129.mttd3t3646rli4lc@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:41:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: mohankumar718@...il.com
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND] drivers: cpufreq: use kstrtoul instead of obsolete
simple_strtoul issue fixed
You mentioned RESEND in $subject, which is incorrect. This isn't a
simple resend but you changed the code. You should have mentioned V2
in $subject and ...
On 21-04-19, 18:05, mohankumar718@...il.com wrote:
> From: Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
>
> Replace the obsolte simple_strtoul function with kstrtoul.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar <mohankumar718@...il.com>
> ---
Mentioned V1->V2 diff right here in the patch.
> drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
> index 03419f064752..6d861c2364e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ static int elanfreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> */
> static int __init elanfreq_setup(char *str)
> {
> - max_freq = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
> + unsigned long int val = 0;
A blank line here would be nice.
> + max_freq = kstrtoul(str, 0, &val);
And this looks wrong. The value isn't returned by kstrtoul but an
error message or 0.
> pr_warn("You're using the deprecated elanfreq command line option. Use elanfreq.max_freq instead, please!\n");
> return 1;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists