[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1126250-14e0-192c-f219-f143f62c9cdd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:05:57 -0500
From: Alex G <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: austin_bolen@...l.com, alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com,
keith.busch@...el.com, Shyam_Iyer@...l.com, lukas@...ner.de,
okaya@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: Account for BW notification in vector
calculation
On 4/22/19 5:43 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> [ 329.725607] vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth,
> limited by 2.5 GT/s x16 link at 0000:00:02.0 (capable of 64.000 Gb/s with 5
> GT/s x16 link)
> [ 708.151488] vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth,
> limited by 2.5 GT/s x16 link at 0000:00:02.0 (capable of 64.000 Gb/s with 5
> GT/s x16 link)
> [ 718.262959] vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth,
> limited by 2.5 GT/s x16 link at 0000:00:02.0 (capable of 64.000 Gb/s with 5
> GT/s x16 link)
> [ 1138.124932] vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth,
> limited by 2.5 GT/s x16 link at 0000:00:02.0 (capable of 64.000 Gb/s with 5
> GT/s x16 link)
>
> What is the value of this nagging?
Good! The bandwidth notification service is working as intended. If this
bothers you, you can unbind the device from the bandwidth notification
driver:
echo 0000:07:00.0:pcie010 |
sudo tee /sys/bus/pci_express/drivers/pcie_bw_notification/unbind
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index 7d04f9d087a6..1b330129089f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ static int pcie_message_numbers(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask,
> * 7.8.2, 7.10.10, 7.31.2.
> */
>
> - if (mask & (PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME | PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP)) {
> + if (mask & (PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME | PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP |
> + PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_BWNOTIF)) {
> pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_FLAGS, ®16);
> *pme = (reg16 & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_IRQ) >> 9;
> nvec = *pme + 1;
Good catch!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists