linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: move platform-specific asm-offset.h to arch/arm/mach-at91

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARHeQJPxZdr=OQW3=+9cx+C+8weBSriY4h0cKAHD2Mv5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:29:49 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: move platform-specific asm-offset.h to arch/arm/mach-at91

On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 8:10 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 4:03 AM Ludovic Desroches
> <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > External E-Mail
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/04/2019 16:54:26+0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > <generated/at91_pm_data-offsets.h> is only generated and included
> > > > by arch/arm/mach-at91/, so it does not need to reside in the
> > > > globally visible include/generated/.
> > > >
> > > > I moved and renamed it to arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_data-offsets.h
> > > > since the prefix 'at91_' is just redundant in mach-at91/.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> > >
> >
> > Applied in at91-soc. Let me know if it's an issue, I plan to do the PR
> > soon.

Sorry. A more fatal issue is this breaks O= build.

Could you drop it?

Thanks.



>
>
> There is one minor issue.
>
> If you apply 2/3 (this one) alone,
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_data-offsets.h is not cleaned.
>
>
> 1/3 fixes the "make clean" issue:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/8/153
>
>
> That is why I sent this as a series
> in order to avoid the regression of cleaning.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Masahiro Yamada
>
>
> > Regards
> >
> > Ludovic
> >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Can this be applied to ARM-SOC tree in a series?
> > > > (with Ack from the platform sub-maintainer.)
> > > >
> > > > at91_pm_data-offsets.h header does not need to reside in
> > > > include/generated/, but you may ask
> > > > "Why must it get out of include/generated/?"
> > > >
> > > > My main motivation is to avoid a race condition in the currently
> > > > proposed patch:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052763/
> > > >
> > > > This patch tries to embed some build artifacts into the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > If arch/arm/mach-at91/ and kernel/ are built at the same time,
> > > > it may embed a truncated file.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-at91/.gitignore   | 1 +
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile     | 5 +++--
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S | 2 +-
> > > >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/.gitignore
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/.gitignore b/arch/arm/mach-at91/.gitignore
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..2ecd6f51c8a9
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/.gitignore
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > > > +pm_data-offsets.h
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > > > index 31b61f0e1c07..de64301dcff2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > > > @@ -19,9 +19,10 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG),y)
> > > >  CFLAGS_pm.o += -DDEBUG
> > > >  endif
> > > >
> > > > -include/generated/at91_pm_data-offsets.h: arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_data-offsets.s FORCE
> > > > +$(obj)/pm_data-offsets.h: $(obj)/pm_data-offsets.s FORCE
> > > >     $(call filechk,offsets,__PM_DATA_OFFSETS_H__)
> > > >
> > > > -arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.o: include/generated/at91_pm_data-offsets.h
> > > > +$(obj)/pm_suspend.o: $(obj)/pm_data-offsets.h
> > > >
> > > >  targets += pm_data-offsets.s
> > > > +clean-files += pm_data-offsets.h
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S
> > > > index bfe1c4d06901..a31c1b20f3fa 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S
> > > > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/linkage.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/clk/at91_pmc.h>
> > > >  #include "pm.h"
> > > > -#include "generated/at91_pm_data-offsets.h"
> > > > +#include "pm_data-offsets.h"
> > > >
> > > >  #define    SRAMC_SELF_FRESH_ACTIVE         0x01
> > > >  #define    SRAMC_SELF_FRESH_EXIT           0x00
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> > > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> > > https://bootlin.com
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada