[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVSM0vrMVr2y0ECAQ=tNGvBs=im2Kxongq-jvdzUBevbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:47:34 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Does vdso_install attempt to re-compile objects under root privilege?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:08 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have a question about 'vdso_install'.
>
>
> In my understanding, vdso is embedded in the kernel.
> In addition, you can run 'make vdso_install'
> to install an unstripped version of vdso.
> (Mainly, debugging purpose?)
>
> By default, 'make vdso_install' will install it to
> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/vdso/.
>
>
> Since that directly is owned by root,
> 'make vdso_install' could potentially be
> executed by root, isn't it?
>
>
> Currently, 'vdso_install' depends on vdso,
> so it may cause recompilation of objects
> in the source tree.
Hmm. I suppose an alternative would be for vdso_install to fail if
the vdso isn't built?
What's the ideal outcome here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists