[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-ZxvK7L90Xkf=U=GEeucGg9qJ+TDabuguFCxeUbn_GeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:57:41 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: sysreg: make mrs_s and msr_s macros work with
Clang and LTO
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 00:55, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:38 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > +#define __msr_s(r, v) \
> > + DEFINE_MSR_S \
> > +" msr_s " __stringify(r) ", %x0\n" \
> > + UNDEFINE_MSR_S : : "rZ" (v)
>
> BTW ... is "%x0" a typo here? Shouldn't this just be "%0"?
>
No, iirc, that is required to force clang to choose a x# encoding
(which is the only one supported by msr/mrs instructions). Otherwise,
it will infer from the operand size which encoding to use, and attempt
to use w# for 32-bit system registers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists