[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423085533.GF11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:55:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] numa: introduce per-cgroup preferred numa node
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:13:36AM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index af171ccb56a2..6513504373b4 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -2031,6 +2031,10 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr);
>
> + page = alloc_page_numa_preferred(gfp, order);
> + if (page)
> + goto out;
> +
> if (pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
> unsigned nid;
>
This I think is wrong, it overrides app specific mbind() requests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists