[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423094644.GL11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:46:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] numa: append per-node execution info in
memory.numa_stat
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 05:36:25PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/4/23 下午4:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:12:20AM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> >> This patch introduced numa execution information, to imply the numa
> >> efficiency.
> >>
> >> By doing 'cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/CGROUP_PATH/memory.numa_stat', we
> >> see new output line heading with 'exectime', like:
> >>
> >> exectime 24399843 27865444
> >>
> >> which means the tasks of this cgroup executed 24399843 ticks on node 0,
> >> and 27865444 ticks on node 1.
> >
> > I think we stopped reporting time in HZ to userspace a long long time
> > ago. Please don't do that.
>
> Ah I see, let's make it us maybe?
ms might be best I think.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists