[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e3c163c-2a89-72d9-ee93-7fea3692b609@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:01:14 +0800
From: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] numa: append per-node execution info in
memory.numa_stat
On 2019/4/23 下午5:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 05:36:25PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019/4/23 下午4:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:12:20AM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
>>>> This patch introduced numa execution information, to imply the numa
>>>> efficiency.
>>>>
>>>> By doing 'cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/CGROUP_PATH/memory.numa_stat', we
>>>> see new output line heading with 'exectime', like:
>>>>
>>>> exectime 24399843 27865444
>>>>
>>>> which means the tasks of this cgroup executed 24399843 ticks on node 0,
>>>> and 27865444 ticks on node 1.
>>>
>>> I think we stopped reporting time in HZ to userspace a long long time
>>> ago. Please don't do that.
>>
>> Ah I see, let's make it us maybe?
>
> ms might be best I think.
Will be in next version.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists