[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423124525.axaprwy4qofbqfhj@laureti-dev>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:45:27 +0200
From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>
To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com>
CC: <bbrezillon@...nel.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<michals@...inx.com>, <nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v14] mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm
pl353 smc nand interface
WARNING: This driver might brick the hardware. See below.
Hi Naga,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:40:13PM +0530, Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote:
> Changes in v14:
> - Removed legacy hooks as per Miquel comments
Thank you for the update.
> +static inline int pl353_wait_for_dev_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + PL353_NAND_DEV_BUSY_TIMEOUT;
> +
> + do {
> + if (pl353_smc_get_nand_int_status_raw()) {
> + pl353_smc_clr_nand_int();
> + break;
A closing brace is missing here. This causes a compilation failure.
> +
> + cpu_relax();
You previously used cond_resched (via nand_wait_ready) here. Why did you
change it to cpu_relax()?
> + } while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + pr_err("%s timed out\n", __func__);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int pl353_nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + u8 *buf, int oob_required, int page)
> +{
> + int i, stat, eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> + int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
> + int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
> + u8 *p = buf;
> + u8 *ecc_calc = chip->ecc.calc_buf;
> + u8 *ecc = chip->ecc.code_buf;
> + unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> + u8 *oob_ptr;
> + u32 ret;
> + unsigned long data_phase_addr;
> + unsigned long nand_offset = (unsigned long __force)xnfc->regs;
The variable xnfc is undeclared here. Consider swapping the line with
the next one.
> + struct pl353_nand_controller *xnfc = to_pl353_nand(chip);
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
After loading the driver, the device does not work. The dmesg output is:
nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
Bad block table not found for chip 0
Bad block table not found for chip 0
Scanning device for bad blocks
nand_bbt: error while writing BBT block -524
nand_bbt: error while writing BBT block -524
nand_bbt: error while writing BBT block -524
nand_bbt: error while writing BBT block -524
No space left to write bad block table
nand_bbt: error while writing bad block table -28
pl353-nand e1000000.flash: could not scan the nand chip
pl353-nand: probe of e1000000.flash failed with error -28
After trying the driver, the flash chip was bricked. Neither the old
driver nor the uboot-xlnx driver nor the Xilinx fsbl are able to talk to
the chip afterwards. This behaviour persists even after a full power
cycle. I'll try reinitializing the flash chip next. I've only seen this
behaviour once, so there is a slight chance that the cause is something
else.
Helmut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists