linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] qcom: dts: thermal cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:26:40 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] qcom: dts: thermal cleanups

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:01 PM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr> wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2019 20:46, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:58 PM Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/03/2019 11:12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >>
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>> - Devices that are not associated with cooling-maps use the 'hot' type
> >>> - Remove critical trip from such devices too and restrict that type of CPUs
> >>> - For 8916, add the sensor on the modem
> >>>
> >>> Description:
> >>> - Expose all temperature sensors on msm8916, msm996, msm8998, sdm845
> >>> - split up the register address map for msm8998
> >>> - standardize names of the various thermal-zones across boards to make it
> >>>   easy for test scripts to parse
> >>
> >> This is what I see on msm8998 with your patch series applied on top of
> >> yesterday's next:
> >>
> >> # dmesg | grep of_parse_thermal_zones
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu0-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu1-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu2-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu3-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu4-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu5-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu6-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu7-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-bottom zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-top zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster0-mhm-thermal zone -22
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-mhm-thermal zone -22
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-l2-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build modem-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build mem-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build wlan-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build q6-dsp-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build camera-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build multimedia-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build pm8998 zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build battery-thermal zone 0
> >> of_parse_thermal_zones: build skin-thermal zone 0
> >>
> >> NB: -EINVAL for cluster0-mhm-thermal and cluster1-mhm-thermal
> >>
> >>
> >> # cat /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp
> >> 35800
> >> 35200
> >> 34500
> >> 34800
> >> 34500
> >> 34100
> >> 34100
> >> 33500
> >> 33800
> >> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone17/temp: Invalid argument
> >> 36100
> >> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone19/temp: Invalid argument
> >> 35500
> >> 36100
> >> 35800
> >> 35200
> >> 35500
> >> 36100
> >> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone8/temp: Invalid argument
> >> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone9/temp: Invalid argument
> >>
> >>
> >> Are the failures expected?
> >> (cluster*-mhm-thermal and thermal_zone*/temp)
> >
> > No they are not. Unfortunately, I didn't have HW to test, so
> > appreciate the help with testing. I'll check the 8, 9, 17 and 19 again
> > before resubmitting.
>
> Looks like Andy merged this series?

Argh! my bad, I completely forgot about the need to fix this up. I
need to get me one of these boards.

> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
>
> I was expecting a respin, or a discussion of the failures.
>
> Slightly confused. What next?
>

We can either revert that one patch for the msm8998, but I think it
might be better if I send a fixup patch that could fixup those 4 zones
instead.

Does that work for you?

Regards,
Amit