[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AF4D908CC0E2A24EB308A26962C8C3BDEB16AE@DGGEMI530-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:10:52 +0000
From: weizhenliang <weizhenliang@...wei.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"colona@...sta.com" <colona@...sta.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"christian@...uner.io" <christian@...uner.io>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"deepa.kernel@...il.com" <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] signal: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>On 04/22, Zhenliang Wei wrote:
>>
>> --- a/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
>> if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
>> ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
>> sigdelset(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
>> + trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, SIG_DFL);
>> recalc_sigpending();
>> goto fatal;
>> }
>
>Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Last time Oleg suggested using SIG_DFL as the third parameter, but its type is 'void (*)(int)', but not expected 'struct k_sigaction *'.
How about
trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, &sighand->action[signr - 1]);
?
Although we know that action[SIGKILL] must be SIG_DFL, in order to adapt to the parameter type, I suggest to use the original variable value.
Zhenliang Wei.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists