[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190423133553.GA5921@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:35:53 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: weizhenliang <weizhenliang@...wei.com>
Cc: "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"colona@...sta.com" <colona@...sta.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"christian@...uner.io" <christian@...uner.io>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"deepa.kernel@...il.com" <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] signal: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit
On 04/23, weizhenliang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >On 04/22, Zhenliang Wei wrote:
> >>
> >> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> >> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
> >> if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
> >> ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
> >> sigdelset(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
> >> + trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, SIG_DFL);
> >> recalc_sigpending();
> >> goto fatal;
> >> }
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> Last time Oleg suggested using SIG_DFL as the third parameter, but its type is 'void (*)(int)', but not expected 'struct k_sigaction *'.
Yes I misread the signature of TRACE_EVENT(signal_deliver), and I thought you at
least compiled the kernel with your patch applied ;)
> How about
> trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, &sighand->action[signr - 1]);
> ?
sure, this should fix the problem.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists