[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AF4D908CC0E2A24EB308A26962C8C3BDEB16FB@DGGEMI530-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:25:07 +0000
From: weizhenliang <weizhenliang@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"colona@...sta.com" <colona@...sta.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"christian@...uner.io" <christian@...uner.io>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"deepa.kernel@...il.com" <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] signal: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit
On 04/23, Greg KH wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:59:50PM +0800, Zhenliang Wei wrote:
>> In the fixes commit, removing SIGKILL from each thread signal mask and
>> executing "goto fatal" directly will skip the call to
>> "trace_signal_deliver". At this point, the delivery tracking of the
>> SIGKILL signal will be inaccurate.
>>
>> Therefore, we need to add trace_signal_deliver before "goto fatal"
>> after executing sigdelset.
>>
>> Note: The action[SIGKILL] must be SIG_DFL, and SEND_SIG_NOINFO matches
>> the fact that SIGKILL doesn't have any info.
>>
>> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
>> Fixes: cf43a757fd4944 ("signal: Restore the stop PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenliang Wei <weizhenliang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/signal.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index
>> 227ba170298e..0f69ada376ef 100644
>> --- a/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
>> if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
>> ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
>> sigdelset(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
>> + trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, SIG_DFL);
>> recalc_sigpending();
>> goto fatal;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.14.1.windows.1
>>
>>
>
><formletter>
>
>This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>for how to do this properly.
>
></formletter>
Thans for your reply, is that mean I still need to add tags
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
if I want to submit this patch to the stable kernel tree?
Is my understanding correct or missing?
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists