linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/mem_encrypt: fix a crash with kmemleak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190423151804.GC16353@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:18:04 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/mem_encrypt: fix a crash with kmemleak_scan

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> In reality, this is only the second place that needs this kmemleak_free_part()
> call for all those years since kmemleak was born.

And? Which place warrants doing it right? The third? Fourth?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.