linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: mark (__)cpus_have_const_cap as __always

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-3-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:50 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: mark (__)cpus_have_const_cap as __always_inline

This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common
place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand.

If it is enabled for arm64, the following errors are reported:

In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:68,
                 from <command-line>:
./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h: In function 'cpus_have_const_cap':
./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn't match constraints
 #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0)
                                      ^~~
./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto'
  asm_volatile_goto(
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
 #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0)
                                      ^~~
./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto'
  asm_volatile_goto(
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
  - split into a separate patch

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index e505e1fbd2b9..77d1aa57323e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_have_feature(unsigned int num)
 }
 
 /* System capability check for constant caps */
-static inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
 {
 	if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
 		return false;
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num)
 	return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
 }
 
-static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
 {
 	if (static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready))
 		return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
-- 
2.17.1