linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] HID: logitech: Enable high-resolution scrolling on Logitech mice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM4jgCrYBr+M+F2iAn8-pPFjiZQ-nPT_H16WcyPKp2PFCM=qhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:34:41 +0200
From:   Clément VUCHENER <clement.vuchener@...il.com>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:     Harry Cutts <hcutts@...omium.org>,
        Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@...itech.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] HID: logitech: Enable high-resolution scrolling on
 Logitech mice

Hi Benjamin,

I tried again to add hi-res wheel support for the G500 with Hans de
Goede's latest patch series you've just merged in for-5.2/logitech, it
is much better but there is still some issues.

The first one is the device index, I need to use device index 0
instead 0xff. I added a quick and dirty quirk (stealing in the
QUIRK_CLASS range since the normal quirk range looks full) to change
the device index assigned in __hidpp_send_report. After that the
device is correctly initialized and the wheel multiplier is set.

The second issue is that wheel values are not actually scaled
according to the multiplier. I get 7/8 full scroll event for each
wheel step. I think it happens because the mouse is split in two
devices. The first device has the wheel events, and the second device
has the HID++ reports. The wheel multiplier is only set on the second
device (where the hi-res mode is enabled) and does not affect the
wheel events from the first one.

Le mer. 19 déc. 2018 à 21:35, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:57 AM Clément VUCHENER
> <clement.vuchener@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Le sam. 15 déc. 2018 à 15:45, Clément VUCHENER
> > <clement.vuchener@...il.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Le ven. 14 déc. 2018 à 19:37, Harry Cutts <hcutts@...omium.org> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Hi Clement,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:47, Clément VUCHENER
> > > > <clement.vuchener@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi, The G500s (and the G500 too, I think) does support the "scrolling
> > > > > acceleration" bit. If I set it, I get around 8 events for each wheel
> > > > > "click", this is what this driver expects, right? If I understood
> > > > > correctly, I should try this patch with the
> > > > > HIDPP_QUIRK_HI_RES_SCROLL_1P0 quirk set for my mouse.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the info! Yes, that should work.
> > >
> > > Well, it is not that simple. I get "Device not connected" errors for
> > > both interfaces of the mouse.
> >
> > I suspect the device is not responding because the hid device is not
> > started. When is hid_hw_start supposed to be called? It is called
> > early for HID_QUIRK_CLASS_G920 but later for other device. So the
> > device is not started when hidpp_is_connected is called. Is this
> > because most of the device in this driver are not real HID devices but
> > DJ devices? How should non-DJ devices be treated?
>
> Hi Clement,
>
> I have a series I sent last September that allows to support non DJ
> devices on logitech-hidpp
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=16359).
>
> In its current form, with the latest upstream kernel, the series will
> oops during the .event() callback, which is easy enough to fix.
> However, I am currently trying to make it better as a second or third
> reading made me realized that there was a bunch of non-sense in it and
> a proper support would require slightly more work for the non unifying
> receiver case.
>
> I hope I'll be able to send out something by the end of the week.
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin