[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d197785a-9e3b-2c88-d882-b59075a38264@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:20:34 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Cc: huawei.libin@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable kprobe to monitor sdei event handler
Hi Xiongfeng Wang,
On 12/04/2019 13:04, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> When I use kprobe to monitor a sdei event handler,
Don't do this! SDEI is like an NMI, it isn't safe to kprobe it as it can interrupt the
kprobe code, causing it become re-entrant.
> the CPU will hang. It's
> because when I probe the event handler, the instruction will be replaced with
> brk instruction and brk exception is unmaskable. But 'vbar_el1' contains
> 'tramp_vectors' in '_sdei_handler' when SDEI events interrupt userspace, so
> we will go to the wrong place if brk exception happens.
This was lucky! Its even more fun if the SDEI event interrupted a guest: the kvm vectors
will give you a hyp-panic.
The __kprobes and NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() litter should stop you doing this.
> I notice that 'ghes_sdei_normal_callback' call several funtions that are not
> marked as 'nokprobe'.
Bother. We should probably blacklist those too, its not safe.
> So I was wondering if we can enable kprobe in '_sdei_handler'.
I don't think this can be done safely.
If you need to monitor your SDEI event handler you can just use printk(). Once nmi_enter()
has been called these are safe as they stash data in a per-cpu buffer. The SDEI handler
will exit via the IRQ vector if it can, which will cause this buffer to be flushed to the
console in a timely manner.
Why do you need to kprobe an NMI handler?
Thanks!
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists