lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:20:34 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Cc:     huawei.libin@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable kprobe to monitor sdei event handler

Hi Xiongfeng Wang,

On 12/04/2019 13:04, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> When I use kprobe to monitor a sdei event handler,

Don't do this! SDEI is like an NMI, it isn't safe to kprobe it as it can interrupt the
kprobe code, causing it become re-entrant.


> the CPU will hang. It's
> because when I probe the event handler, the instruction will be replaced with 
> brk instruction and brk exception is unmaskable. But 'vbar_el1' contains 
> 'tramp_vectors' in '_sdei_handler' when SDEI events interrupt userspace, so
> we will go to the wrong place if brk exception happens.

This was lucky! Its even more fun if the SDEI event interrupted a guest: the kvm vectors
will give you a hyp-panic.

The __kprobes and NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() litter should stop you doing this.


> I notice that 'ghes_sdei_normal_callback' call several funtions that are not
> marked as 'nokprobe'.

Bother. We should probably blacklist those too, its not safe.


> So I was wondering if we can enable kprobe in '_sdei_handler'.

I don't think this can be done safely.


If you need to monitor your SDEI event handler you can just use printk(). Once nmi_enter()
has been called these are safe as they stash data in a per-cpu buffer. The SDEI handler
will exit via the IRQ vector if it can, which will cause this buffer to be flushed to the
console in a timely manner.


Why do you need to kprobe an NMI handler?



Thanks!

James

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ