[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424163424.GG4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:34:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amit.kachhap@...il.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
javi.merino@...nel.org, edubezval@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Introduce Thermal Pressure
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:29:32PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Assuming PeterZ & Rafael & Quentin doesn't hate the whole thermal load
> tracking approach.
I seem to remember competing proposals, and have forgotten everything
about them; the cover letter also didn't have references to them or
mention them in any way.
As to the averaging and period, I personally prefer a PELT signal with
the windows lined up, if that really is too short a window, then a PELT
like signal with a natural multiple of the PELT period would make sense,
such that the windows still line up nicely.
Mixing different averaging methods and non-aligned windows just makes me
uncomfortable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists