linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190424135228.58cdb9be@coco.lan>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:52:28 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        x86@...nel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx
 TOC tree

Em Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:18:46 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:

> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:28:29 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation
> > from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to
> > reST format in this serias.
> > 
> > In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs conversion.  
> 
> As mentioned by others, this is a lot of stuff; I would really rather see
> each of those groups as separate patch sets.

Yeah, makes sense to me, either to split into separate patchsets or to
group the changes per sub-dir (or both).

> If you can do a reasonably quick turnaround with Mauro's suggestions
> addressed and tags applied, we should be able to get at least some of this
> into 5.2.  Thanks, Mauro, for looking at all of this stuff!

Anytime! Just to make clear, I'm still reviewing it... I'm at patch 35/63
now. So, expect more comments from my side.


Thanks,
Mauro